So far this year, 26 billionaires have donated more than $61 million to
super PACs, according to the Center for Responsive Politics. And that’s
only what has been publicly disclosed.” That didn’t include “about $100
million that Sheldon Adelson has said that he is willing to spend to
defeat President Obama; or the $400 million that the Koch brothers have
pledged to spend during the 2012 election season.”
What the Supreme court has done through their Citizens United decision is establish an oligarchy....they have made it possible for money to speak so loud that, if we are not careful, drown out the vote of the common man. Now more than at any time in our history one party is attempting to replace "one man, one vote" with "one dollar, one vote."
During a Senate Judiciary subcommittee hearing on Tuesday, Bernie Sanders put it this way:
“What the Supreme Court did in Citizens United is to say to these same
billionaires and the corporations they control: ‘You own and control the
economy; you own Wall Street; you own the coal companies; you own the
oil companies. Now, for a very small percentage of your wealth, we’re
going to give you the opportunity to own the United States government.’ ”
Saturday, July 28, 2012
Sunday, July 22, 2012
COMING OUT OF THAT "DARK KNIGHT"
In the wake of the barbaric acts of atrocity planned for months and perpetrated by a deeply disturbed doctoral candidate, we must look back, yes. But we must also look forward and ask ourselves how we can prevent these instances that have become all too prevelent in our country. Colombine, Virginia Tech and now Aurora, our youth in America are acting out in unspeakable ways, namely the taking of multiple lives in order to gain fame and seeking the help they so despirately need.
He wasn't born to do this. He had every advantage in life...a loving middle class home, a nuclear family with conservative parents and a superior intellect that resulted in degrees and recognition with honors.
So while the question being asked across the country and the world is WHY? My question is WHO KNEW? Someone knew this young man needed help. Someone knew there was something going desperately wrong in his life. A Phd. candidate who suddenly quits school, goes online and orders enough weapons to carry out a personal war....someone knew he was in trouble.
There are so many people out there amongst us who desperately need help. We need an anonymous National Mental Health tip line so that these people can get the help they need before another tragedy like this unfolds. I don't know what this would look like, or how this could be enforced or investigated, but doing nothing will ultimately cost more innocent lives.
The real tragedy is that someone knew this guy needed help. Someone could see the signs.....friends, family, an educator, a healthcare provider, an employer....someone knew this guy needed help. But they didn't know who to call, or what to do, or were afraid to get involved.
A national helpline would be a first step. A data base of names of people who may need help, of people whose lives were going sideways. A data base of names to check before selling someone a roll magazine bulk ammo accessory that would allow someone to fire off 100 rounds per minute. A data base to check before selling someone thousands of bullets online, and bullet proof vests, and a gas mask and all the accoutrements this disturbed young man acquired in order to commit this atrocity.
We cannot remain silent any longer. Someone knew......and the cost of their silence(s) can be seen in Aurora and Columbine and Virginia Tech and on and on.... We cannot afford to stay silent any longer.
God bless all those who personally experienced this horrific event...may they find peace. God bless the victims who will recover and God bless the ultimate victims, the unfortunate people who through no fault of there own died at the hands of this troubled soul (some pictured above). Good people who died...because someone knew....at least someone should have known...and either didn't know what to do, or chose to do nothing. Someone knew what we all know now. This man was a time bomb waiting to go off....and he did...and hundreds of lives have been inextricably altered because of it in a horrific and brutal way.
He wasn't born to do this. He had every advantage in life...a loving middle class home, a nuclear family with conservative parents and a superior intellect that resulted in degrees and recognition with honors.
So while the question being asked across the country and the world is WHY? My question is WHO KNEW? Someone knew this young man needed help. Someone knew there was something going desperately wrong in his life. A Phd. candidate who suddenly quits school, goes online and orders enough weapons to carry out a personal war....someone knew he was in trouble.
There are so many people out there amongst us who desperately need help. We need an anonymous National Mental Health tip line so that these people can get the help they need before another tragedy like this unfolds. I don't know what this would look like, or how this could be enforced or investigated, but doing nothing will ultimately cost more innocent lives.
The real tragedy is that someone knew this guy needed help. Someone could see the signs.....friends, family, an educator, a healthcare provider, an employer....someone knew this guy needed help. But they didn't know who to call, or what to do, or were afraid to get involved.
A national helpline would be a first step. A data base of names of people who may need help, of people whose lives were going sideways. A data base of names to check before selling someone a roll magazine bulk ammo accessory that would allow someone to fire off 100 rounds per minute. A data base to check before selling someone thousands of bullets online, and bullet proof vests, and a gas mask and all the accoutrements this disturbed young man acquired in order to commit this atrocity.
We cannot remain silent any longer. Someone knew......and the cost of their silence(s) can be seen in Aurora and Columbine and Virginia Tech and on and on.... We cannot afford to stay silent any longer.
God bless all those who personally experienced this horrific event...may they find peace. God bless the victims who will recover and God bless the ultimate victims, the unfortunate people who through no fault of there own died at the hands of this troubled soul (some pictured above). Good people who died...because someone knew....at least someone should have known...and either didn't know what to do, or chose to do nothing. Someone knew what we all know now. This man was a time bomb waiting to go off....and he did...and hundreds of lives have been inextricably altered because of it in a horrific and brutal way.
Wednesday, July 4, 2012
REFLECTIONS ON A ONCE GREAT NATION
If you are an Aaron Sorkin devotee like I am, you have been watching the first two episodes of a new series on HBO called "The Newsroom."
In its first episode, Jeff Daniels, who plays a veteran newscaster named Will McEvoy, is on the speaking circuit, this time as part of the usual college debate, with McEvoy flanked by the usual talking heads, one ultra right wing, and one ultra liberal.
During a Q & A session, one of the college students in the audience asks ‘What makes America the greatest country in the
world?’
McEvoy pauses for a few seconds, then
goes on an almighty (factually accurate, statistically) rant about why
America is NOT the world’s greatest country, a concept that would be
horrifyingly alien to 99.99 per cent of Americans I know:
"There is absolutely no evidence to support the statement that America is the greatest country on earth.....we’re seventh in literacy, 27th in
math, 22nd in science, 49th in life expectancy, 178th in infant
mortality, third in median household income, fourth in labor force and
fourth in exports.
We lead the world in only three categories – number
of incarcerated citizens per capita, number of adults who believe angels
are real, and defense spending, where we spend more than the next 26
countries combined, 25 of which are our allies… So when you ask what makes us the greatest country
in the world, I don’t know what the f*** you’re talking about....Yosemite?
As the students look on, stunned, he
adds, ‘We sure used to be… We stood up for what was right, we fought for moral reasons, we waged wars on poverty, not poor people. We
sacrificed, we cared about our neighbors, we put our money where our
mouths were, and we never beat our chest. We built great big things,
made ungodly technological advances, explored the universe, cured
diseases, and cultivated the world’s greatest artists and the world’s
greatest economy. We reached for the stars, and acted like men…we aspired to intelligence and didn't belittle it, it didn't make us feel inferior, we didn't identify ourselves by who we voted for in the last election.... and we didn't scare so easy."
We were
able to be all these things and do all these things because we were
informed, by great men… The first step in solving any problem is recognizing there is one – America is not the greatest country in the
world any more.’
Sobering dialogue to be sure, but factually accurate...we are no longer the greatest country in the world.......but what McEvoy didn't say...and desperately needed to say was, "but we can be again."
Now I'm not going to go off on a rant of my own (which would pale in comparison to Sorkin's incredible writing flair), except to say that we lost something generations ago. We lost something and we never even knew it...I guess we were so busy beating our chests in a sense of false pride we didn't even notice it was slipping away from us.
During World War II this country came together as in no other time in our history...ration books became necessary for staples like coffee, sugar and petroleum, goods normally made of rubber and scrap metal were scarce as they were used to produce ammunition, gas masks and explosives.
During World War II this country came together as in no other time in our history...ration books became necessary for staples like coffee, sugar and petroleum, goods normally made of rubber and scrap metal were scarce as they were used to produce ammunition, gas masks and explosives.
A call came down from our leaders to save scrap metal in order to bolster our sorely lacking production of airplanes. While recent historical studies indicate that the scrap drives were more
important as morale boosters than in providing essential products for
the war effort. But, the general public did get caught up in the
patriotic enthusiasm — some saved tin foil from gum wrappers, making a
tin foil ball until it reached a size large enough to be accepted by the
collection site. Scrap paper was more easily collected and was used to
package armaments. Grease was saved and recycled to make ammunition.
They came together and along with the adoption of assembly line production techniques from Henry Ford, this great nation far exceeded its goals and produced enough planes...enough planes to form an armada that blanketed the skies....and victory was ours...and democracy continued to live on in Europe as a result.
They came together and along with the adoption of assembly line production techniques from Henry Ford, this great nation far exceeded its goals and produced enough planes...enough planes to form an armada that blanketed the skies....and victory was ours...and democracy continued to live on in Europe as a result.
We came together. I don't know what it would take for this once great nation to come together again. Many would say we never will again....we are too fragmented, too engaged in class warfare to ever come together as a people. It is the haves and have nots. It's me and it's you......it's never "us" anymore.
And that is a shame...because when this nation comes together, there is nothing we can't do. During his term, President Kennedy set the goal of going to the moon, an absurd notion. We were in the middle of racial tensions, riots in our streets not to mention the technology simply did not exsist....there was no reason to possibly think this goal was achievable....but he / we made it happen. Many of you will remember JFK's great speech he gave that historic day in Houston....
"We choose to go to the moon in this
decade and do the other things, not because they are easy, but because
they are hard, because that goal will serve to organize and measure the
best of our energies and skills, because that challenge is one that we
are willing to accept, one we are unwilling to postpone, and one which
we intend to win, and the others, too."
But you may not remember this speech...the speech he gave to Congress upon his return to Washington after making such a bold statement and after challenging the nation to "go where no man had gone before...."
"I believe we possess all the resources and talents necessary. But the
facts of the matter are that we have never made the national decisions
or marshalled the national resources required for such leadership. We
have never specified long-range goals on an urgent time schedule, or
managed our resources and our time so as to insure their fulfillment."
That's leadership....he challenged the nation, he harnessed out energies, he challenged this nation like other great leaders had in WWII and before....because leaders give us vision, they challenge us to achieve and most of all they lead. And as long as Washington fails to come together themselves and actually lead.....we may never come together for one sole purpose again.
"America is not the greatest nation on earth any more."
But we can be...if only our leaders could lead....and bring us together towards common goals...and stop identifying us (and dividing us) by social and political labels...because the day after an election, we used to stop being Democrats and Republicans, and went back to being what we took so much pride in being...Americans. One great nation, under God, with liberty and justice for all.
I envy the youth of America today...because they are too young to remember what it felt like to be an American generations ago. They don't know the shame in what we have become....and what we may never be again.
And that is the world..."The World According to Kimba."
God bless you......and God bless the United States of America.
Tuesday, July 3, 2012
WHAT YOU MAY NOT KNOW ABOUT "OBAMA-CARES"
Under the new law, young adults are allowed to stay on their parent’s
plan until they turn 26 years old. (In the case of existing group health
plans, this right does not apply if the young adult is offered
insurance at work.) Check with your insurance company or employer to see
if you qualify.
All new plans must cover certain preventive services such as mammograms and colonoscopies without charging a deductible, co-pay or coinsurance.
In the past, insurance companies could search for an error, or other technical mistake, on a customer’s application and use this error to deny payment for services when he or she got sick. The new law makes this illegal. After media reports cited incidents of breast cancer patients losing coverage, insurance companies agreed to end this practice immediately.
The law provides consumers with a way to appeal coverage determinations or claims to their insurance company, and establishes an external review process.
Under the new law, insurance companies are prohibited from imposing lifetime dollar limits on essential benefits, like hospital stays.
Under the new law, insurance companies’ use of annual dollar limits on the amount of insurance coverage a patient may receive is restricted for new plans in the individual market and all group plans. In 2014, the use of annual dollar limits on essential benefits like hospital stays will be banned for new plans in the individual market and all group plans.
The new law includes new rules to prevent insurance companies from denying coverage to children under the age of 19 due to a pre-existing condition.
The law allows states that have, or plan to implement, measures that require insurance companies to justify their premium increases to be eligible for $250 million in new grants. Insurance companies with excessive or unjustified premium increases may not be able to participate in the new Affordable Insurance Exchanges in 2014.
To strengthen the availability of primary care, there are new incentives in the law to expand the number of primary care doctors, nurses and physician assistants, including funding for scholarships and loan repayments for primary care doctors and nurses working in under served areas. Doctors and nurses receiving payments made under any state loan repayment or loan forgiveness program intended to increase the availability of health care services in under served or health professional shortage areas will not have to pay taxes on those payments.
Under the new law, states that apply receive federal grants to help set up or expand independent offices to help consumers navigate the private health insurance system. These programs help consumers file complaints and appeals; enroll in health coverage; and get educated about their rights and responsibilities in group health plans or individual health insurance policies. The programs also collect data on the types of problems consumers have, and file reports with the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services to identify trouble spots that need further oversight.
A new $15 billion Prevention and Public Health Fund invests in proven prevention and public health programs that can help keep Americans healthy – from smoking cessation to combating obesity.
The law includes new funding to support the construction of and expansion of services at community health centers, allowing these centers to serve some 20 million new patients across the country.
Today, 68% of medically underserved communities across the nation are in rural areas, and these communities often have trouble attracting and retaining medical professionals. The law provides increased payment to rural health care providers to help them continue to serve their communities.
In 2011, seniors who reach the coverage gap will receive a 50 percent discount when buying Medicare Part D covered brand-name prescription drugs. Over the next ten years, seniors will receive additional savings on brand-name and generic drugs until the coverage gap is closed in 2020.
The law provides certain free preventive services, such as annual wellness visits and personalized prevention plans, for seniors on Medicare.
To ensure premium dollars are spent primarily on health care, the new law generally requires that at least 85% of all premium dollars collected by insurance companies for large employer plans are spent on health care services and health care quality improvement. For plans sold to individuals and small employers, at least 80% of the premium must be spent on benefits and quality improvement. If insurance companies do not meet these goals because their administrative costs or profits are too high, they must provide rebates to consumers.
Today, Medicare pays Medicare Advantage insurance companies over $1,000 more per person on average than is spent per person in Original Medicare. This results in increased premiums for all Medicare beneficiaries, including the 77% of beneficiaries who are not currently enrolled in a Medicare Advantage plan. The new law levels the playing field by gradually eliminating this discrepancy. People enrolled in a Medicare Advantage plan will still receive all guaranteed Medicare benefits, and the law provides bonus payments to Medicare Advantage plans that provide high quality care.
Health care remains one of the few industries that relies on paper records. The new law institutes a series of changes to standardize billing and requires health plans to begin adopting and implementing rules for the secure, confidential, electronic exchange of health information. Using electronic health records will reduce paperwork and administrative burdens, cut costs, reduce medical errors and, most importantly, improve the quality of care.
As Medicaid programs and providers prepare to cover more patients in 2014, the Act requires states to pay primary care physicians no less than 100% of Medicare payment rates in 2013 and 2014 for primary care services. The increase is fully funded by the federal government.
Under the new law, states will receive two more years of funding to continue coverage for children not eligible for Medicaid.
Starting in 2014 if your employer doesn’t offer insurance, you will be able to buy it directly in an Affordable Insurance Exchange. An Exchange is a new transparent and competitive insurance marketplace where individuals and small businesses can buy affordable and qualified health benefit plans. Exchanges will offer you a choice of health plans that meet certain benefits and cost standards. Starting in 2014, Members of Congress will be getting their health care insurance through Exchanges, and you will be able buy your insurance through Exchanges too.
Under the new law, most individuals who can afford it will be required to obtain basic health insurance coverage or pay a fee to help offset the costs of caring for uninsured Americans. If affordable coverage is not available to an individual, he or she will be eligible for an exemption.
Workers meeting certain requirements who cannot afford the coverage provided by their employer may take whatever funds their employer might have contributed to their insurance and use these resources to help purchase a more affordable plan in the new Affordable Insurance Exchanges. These new competitive marketplaces will allow individuals and small businesses to buy qualified health benefit plans.
Americans who earn less than 133% of the poverty level (approximately $14,000 for an individual and $29,000 for a family of four) will be eligible to enroll in Medicaid. States will receive 100% federal funding for the first three years to support this expanded coverage, phasing to 90% federal funding in subsequent years.
Tax credits to help the middle class afford insurance will become available for those with income between 100% and 400% of the poverty line who are not eligible for other affordable coverage. (In 2010, 400% of the poverty line comes out to about $43,000 for an individual or $88,000 for a family of four.) The tax credit is advanceable, so it can lower your premium payments each month, rather than making you wait for tax time. It’s also refundable, so even moderate income families can receive the full benefit of the credit. These individuals may also qualify for reduced cost-sharing (copayments, co-insurance, and deductibles).
The law implements strong reforms that prohibit insurance companies from refusing to sell coverage or renew policies because of an individual’s pre-existing conditions. Also, in the individual and small group market, it eliminates the ability of insurance companies to charge higher rates due to gender or health status.
The law prohibits new plans and existing group plans from imposing annual dollar limits on the amount of coverage an individual may receive.
The law implements the second phase of the small business tax credit for qualified small businesses and small non-profit organizations. In this phase, the credit is up to 50% of the employer’s contribution to provide health insurance for employees. There is also up to a 35% credit for small non-profit organizations.
http://www.healthcare.gov/law/timeline/index.html#event2-pane
All new plans must cover certain preventive services such as mammograms and colonoscopies without charging a deductible, co-pay or coinsurance.
In the past, insurance companies could search for an error, or other technical mistake, on a customer’s application and use this error to deny payment for services when he or she got sick. The new law makes this illegal. After media reports cited incidents of breast cancer patients losing coverage, insurance companies agreed to end this practice immediately.
The law provides consumers with a way to appeal coverage determinations or claims to their insurance company, and establishes an external review process.
Under the new law, insurance companies are prohibited from imposing lifetime dollar limits on essential benefits, like hospital stays.
Under the new law, insurance companies’ use of annual dollar limits on the amount of insurance coverage a patient may receive is restricted for new plans in the individual market and all group plans. In 2014, the use of annual dollar limits on essential benefits like hospital stays will be banned for new plans in the individual market and all group plans.
The new law includes new rules to prevent insurance companies from denying coverage to children under the age of 19 due to a pre-existing condition.
The law allows states that have, or plan to implement, measures that require insurance companies to justify their premium increases to be eligible for $250 million in new grants. Insurance companies with excessive or unjustified premium increases may not be able to participate in the new Affordable Insurance Exchanges in 2014.
To strengthen the availability of primary care, there are new incentives in the law to expand the number of primary care doctors, nurses and physician assistants, including funding for scholarships and loan repayments for primary care doctors and nurses working in under served areas. Doctors and nurses receiving payments made under any state loan repayment or loan forgiveness program intended to increase the availability of health care services in under served or health professional shortage areas will not have to pay taxes on those payments.
Under the new law, states that apply receive federal grants to help set up or expand independent offices to help consumers navigate the private health insurance system. These programs help consumers file complaints and appeals; enroll in health coverage; and get educated about their rights and responsibilities in group health plans or individual health insurance policies. The programs also collect data on the types of problems consumers have, and file reports with the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services to identify trouble spots that need further oversight.
A new $15 billion Prevention and Public Health Fund invests in proven prevention and public health programs that can help keep Americans healthy – from smoking cessation to combating obesity.
The law includes new funding to support the construction of and expansion of services at community health centers, allowing these centers to serve some 20 million new patients across the country.
Today, 68% of medically underserved communities across the nation are in rural areas, and these communities often have trouble attracting and retaining medical professionals. The law provides increased payment to rural health care providers to help them continue to serve their communities.
In 2011, seniors who reach the coverage gap will receive a 50 percent discount when buying Medicare Part D covered brand-name prescription drugs. Over the next ten years, seniors will receive additional savings on brand-name and generic drugs until the coverage gap is closed in 2020.
The law provides certain free preventive services, such as annual wellness visits and personalized prevention plans, for seniors on Medicare.
To ensure premium dollars are spent primarily on health care, the new law generally requires that at least 85% of all premium dollars collected by insurance companies for large employer plans are spent on health care services and health care quality improvement. For plans sold to individuals and small employers, at least 80% of the premium must be spent on benefits and quality improvement. If insurance companies do not meet these goals because their administrative costs or profits are too high, they must provide rebates to consumers.
Today, Medicare pays Medicare Advantage insurance companies over $1,000 more per person on average than is spent per person in Original Medicare. This results in increased premiums for all Medicare beneficiaries, including the 77% of beneficiaries who are not currently enrolled in a Medicare Advantage plan. The new law levels the playing field by gradually eliminating this discrepancy. People enrolled in a Medicare Advantage plan will still receive all guaranteed Medicare benefits, and the law provides bonus payments to Medicare Advantage plans that provide high quality care.
Health care remains one of the few industries that relies on paper records. The new law institutes a series of changes to standardize billing and requires health plans to begin adopting and implementing rules for the secure, confidential, electronic exchange of health information. Using electronic health records will reduce paperwork and administrative burdens, cut costs, reduce medical errors and, most importantly, improve the quality of care.
As Medicaid programs and providers prepare to cover more patients in 2014, the Act requires states to pay primary care physicians no less than 100% of Medicare payment rates in 2013 and 2014 for primary care services. The increase is fully funded by the federal government.
Under the new law, states will receive two more years of funding to continue coverage for children not eligible for Medicaid.
Starting in 2014 if your employer doesn’t offer insurance, you will be able to buy it directly in an Affordable Insurance Exchange. An Exchange is a new transparent and competitive insurance marketplace where individuals and small businesses can buy affordable and qualified health benefit plans. Exchanges will offer you a choice of health plans that meet certain benefits and cost standards. Starting in 2014, Members of Congress will be getting their health care insurance through Exchanges, and you will be able buy your insurance through Exchanges too.
Under the new law, most individuals who can afford it will be required to obtain basic health insurance coverage or pay a fee to help offset the costs of caring for uninsured Americans. If affordable coverage is not available to an individual, he or she will be eligible for an exemption.
Workers meeting certain requirements who cannot afford the coverage provided by their employer may take whatever funds their employer might have contributed to their insurance and use these resources to help purchase a more affordable plan in the new Affordable Insurance Exchanges. These new competitive marketplaces will allow individuals and small businesses to buy qualified health benefit plans.
Americans who earn less than 133% of the poverty level (approximately $14,000 for an individual and $29,000 for a family of four) will be eligible to enroll in Medicaid. States will receive 100% federal funding for the first three years to support this expanded coverage, phasing to 90% federal funding in subsequent years.
Tax credits to help the middle class afford insurance will become available for those with income between 100% and 400% of the poverty line who are not eligible for other affordable coverage. (In 2010, 400% of the poverty line comes out to about $43,000 for an individual or $88,000 for a family of four.) The tax credit is advanceable, so it can lower your premium payments each month, rather than making you wait for tax time. It’s also refundable, so even moderate income families can receive the full benefit of the credit. These individuals may also qualify for reduced cost-sharing (copayments, co-insurance, and deductibles).
The law implements strong reforms that prohibit insurance companies from refusing to sell coverage or renew policies because of an individual’s pre-existing conditions. Also, in the individual and small group market, it eliminates the ability of insurance companies to charge higher rates due to gender or health status.
The law prohibits new plans and existing group plans from imposing annual dollar limits on the amount of coverage an individual may receive.
The law implements the second phase of the small business tax credit for qualified small businesses and small non-profit organizations. In this phase, the credit is up to 50% of the employer’s contribution to provide health insurance for employees. There is also up to a 35% credit for small non-profit organizations.
http://www.healthcare.gov/law/timeline/index.html#event2-pane
Sunday, July 1, 2012
I WANT TO KNOW TOO.....
I want to know what is so terrible about:
- Keeping your kids on your policy until they reach the age of 26.
- Eliminating the lifetime cap on benefits.
- Stopping insurance companies from canceling your policy if you get sick.
- Lowering the cost of care and medication for Medicare recipients.
- Covering preventative care at no charge.
- Strengthening fraud protections by increasing penalties.
- Stopping insurance companies from denying coverage to children with pre-existing conditions.
- Stopping insurance companies from arbitrarily jacking up rates.
- Getting a rebate if your insurance company spent too much on ads and CEO bonuses.
- Tax credits to small businesses so they can afford quality health coverage for their employees.
- Building and improving community health centers.
- Giving working Americans a tax credit so they can afford insurance (begins in 2014).
- Also in 2014, ending discrimination against adults with pre-exiting conditions.
- Preventing insurance companies from charging higher prices to women based solely on their gender (2014).
- Creating insurance exchanges where people can shop and compare and get the most for their health insurance dollars (2014). http://www.addictinginfo.org/2012/06/30/much-ado-about-obamacare/
Saturday, June 30, 2012
Tuesday, June 26, 2012
Saturday, June 23, 2012
FOLLOW THE CAMPAIGN MONEY.....
During Mr. Romney’s 1994 bid to unseat Sen. Edward M. Kennedy (D-Mass.),
he called on the senator to release his tax returns to prove he had
“nothing to hide.” Yet he refuses to release his financial portfolio or even his tax returns as a candidate for the highest office in the land.
Anyone who reads the papers or follows the news is aware Mr. Romney is accumulating massive amounts of cash, building a very impressive "war chest" for the final stretch of his presidential bid...but he steadfastly refuses to release this information, or even name his own named "Top 100 bundlers".....individuals with connections able to quickly and surreptitiously accumulate incredible amounts of campaign donations.
What is he hiding? It must be pointed out, Mr. Romney is operating within the law by keeping his campaign funding machine secret. In doing so, he is however not following a standard he fought tooth and nail to have Kennedy comply to. Double standard? Of course. Hypocritical? Absolutely.
Needless to say the Koch brothers are surely behind much of the fund raising. Some say they are nefarious in their desire to buy this election. Many have said they have a very dark and near criminal record of buying and bribing their way to a billion dollar portfolio themselves.
I say they are worthy of your own research. A simple Google search will give you all the info you will need to know in a very short amount of time.
Furthermore, I say candidate Romney must follow his call to Senator Kennedy and release his financial statements and at the very least, the identities of his bundlers, if not total transparency of all those who seek to assist in the buying of the highest office in our land. Transparency is what is needed most in this election, and anything less would fail my character test in anyone worthy of my consideration for the Presidency of the United States of America.
Candidate Perry did it. President Obama has done it. Candidate Clinton (both of them) did it, and candidate Gingrich promised to do it when he became the nominee.
It is my personal opinion that candidate Romney hasn't because he can't. He can't let the American public know the identities of his bundlers, or his most ardent financial supporters, lest he risks public condemnation. Do I know who is behind him? No. But the web is starting to unravel, and it isn't a pretty picture.
Prove me wrong, Governor. Do as you say and follow your sage advice to Senator Kennedy and release the information, sir. Prove to me you are at least worthy of consideration. Life is a character test sir, and in my eyes you are failing in your failure to do so.
And that is the world....."The World According to Kimba." Thanks for reading.
Anyone who reads the papers or follows the news is aware Mr. Romney is accumulating massive amounts of cash, building a very impressive "war chest" for the final stretch of his presidential bid...but he steadfastly refuses to release this information, or even name his own named "Top 100 bundlers".....individuals with connections able to quickly and surreptitiously accumulate incredible amounts of campaign donations.
What is he hiding? It must be pointed out, Mr. Romney is operating within the law by keeping his campaign funding machine secret. In doing so, he is however not following a standard he fought tooth and nail to have Kennedy comply to. Double standard? Of course. Hypocritical? Absolutely.
Needless to say the Koch brothers are surely behind much of the fund raising. Some say they are nefarious in their desire to buy this election. Many have said they have a very dark and near criminal record of buying and bribing their way to a billion dollar portfolio themselves.
I say they are worthy of your own research. A simple Google search will give you all the info you will need to know in a very short amount of time.
Furthermore, I say candidate Romney must follow his call to Senator Kennedy and release his financial statements and at the very least, the identities of his bundlers, if not total transparency of all those who seek to assist in the buying of the highest office in our land. Transparency is what is needed most in this election, and anything less would fail my character test in anyone worthy of my consideration for the Presidency of the United States of America.
Candidate Perry did it. President Obama has done it. Candidate Clinton (both of them) did it, and candidate Gingrich promised to do it when he became the nominee.
It is my personal opinion that candidate Romney hasn't because he can't. He can't let the American public know the identities of his bundlers, or his most ardent financial supporters, lest he risks public condemnation. Do I know who is behind him? No. But the web is starting to unravel, and it isn't a pretty picture.
Prove me wrong, Governor. Do as you say and follow your sage advice to Senator Kennedy and release the information, sir. Prove to me you are at least worthy of consideration. Life is a character test sir, and in my eyes you are failing in your failure to do so.
And that is the world....."The World According to Kimba." Thanks for reading.
SECRET ROMNEY OPERATIVES ARE BUNDLING AWAY MASSIVE AMOUNTS OF CASH
http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/mr-romneys-secret-bundlers/2012/06/09/gJQAkAqkQV_story.html
".........Bundlers play an essential role in presidential campaigns — Mr. Romney’s in particular. The latest figures show that just 15 percent of the Romney campaign’s May total came in donations of $200 or less, compared with 40 percent of contributions to the Obama campaign. Such hauls of maximum-dollar checks do not happen without the assiduous behind-the-scenes work of well-connected bundlers.
The snippets of disclosure of lobbyist-bundlers illustrate that point: An analysis of Federal Election Commission filings by the Public Campaign Action Fund found that 25 lobbyists had bundled more than $3 million for the Romney campaign through April, including a Barclays Capital executive, Patrick Durkin, who was near the $1 million mark ($927,160.)
A Romney campaign pamphlet prepared for donors details the special perks lavished on those who haul in the biggest bundles: “Stars,” who raise $250,000, and ”Stripes,” who bring in $500,000 or more. “Stripes” receive everything from a “dedicated Romney Victory headquarters staff member” to access to debates to “signature membership pieces and apparel.” Indeed, the campaign promised to publish the information it declines to reveal to the public by listing bundlers’ names in a ”Stars and Stripes Commemorative Book.” The Post reported Friday that the Romney campaign’s “top 100 bundlers — ‘Team 100’ — are heading to a private retreat in Utah on June 22-24 to plot out how to replicate the May success in the months ahead.”
Who are these men and women to whom the campaign is so deeply indebted? Mr. Romney has yet to answer — indeed, he has yet to be directly asked — why his campaign will not live up to the standard set by Mr. Bush and Mr. McCain. Why would he hide his roster of key supporters?
More on this debate:
The Post’s View: Mr. Romney’s secrets
The Post’s View: Mitt Romney’s secret money
".........Bundlers play an essential role in presidential campaigns — Mr. Romney’s in particular. The latest figures show that just 15 percent of the Romney campaign’s May total came in donations of $200 or less, compared with 40 percent of contributions to the Obama campaign. Such hauls of maximum-dollar checks do not happen without the assiduous behind-the-scenes work of well-connected bundlers.
The snippets of disclosure of lobbyist-bundlers illustrate that point: An analysis of Federal Election Commission filings by the Public Campaign Action Fund found that 25 lobbyists had bundled more than $3 million for the Romney campaign through April, including a Barclays Capital executive, Patrick Durkin, who was near the $1 million mark ($927,160.)
A Romney campaign pamphlet prepared for donors details the special perks lavished on those who haul in the biggest bundles: “Stars,” who raise $250,000, and ”Stripes,” who bring in $500,000 or more. “Stripes” receive everything from a “dedicated Romney Victory headquarters staff member” to access to debates to “signature membership pieces and apparel.” Indeed, the campaign promised to publish the information it declines to reveal to the public by listing bundlers’ names in a ”Stars and Stripes Commemorative Book.” The Post reported Friday that the Romney campaign’s “top 100 bundlers — ‘Team 100’ — are heading to a private retreat in Utah on June 22-24 to plot out how to replicate the May success in the months ahead.”
Who are these men and women to whom the campaign is so deeply indebted? Mr. Romney has yet to answer — indeed, he has yet to be directly asked — why his campaign will not live up to the standard set by Mr. Bush and Mr. McCain. Why would he hide his roster of key supporters?
The Post’s View: Mr. Romney’s secrets
The Post’s View: Mitt Romney’s secret money
Tuesday, June 19, 2012
Sunday, June 10, 2012
Saturday, June 9, 2012
MISS HIM? YOU HAVE TO BE KIDDING
Yes, I'm a hater, folks. Miss him? Bush left the White House with a
dismal economic record. By almost every measure — GDP growth, jobs,
median incomes, financial-market performance — he stacks up as probably
the least-successful President on the economic front since Herbert
Hoover. Bush spent money like a liberal.
He brought us back to deficits with overspending and tax cuts. He got us into wars we could not afford for whatever the reason (and it wasn't WMD's). He lost jobs at an alarming rate....700,000 jobs in his last month alone.
Need more? How about......Alberto Gonzales, Kyoto treaty, Katrina / FEMA, Halliburton, stem cell research, Bin Laden, body armor, Mission Accomplished, the war will pay for itself...NEED I GO ON????
He brought us back to deficits with overspending and tax cuts. He got us into wars we could not afford for whatever the reason (and it wasn't WMD's). He lost jobs at an alarming rate....700,000 jobs in his last month alone.
Need more? How about......Alberto Gonzales, Kyoto treaty, Katrina / FEMA, Halliburton, stem cell research, Bin Laden, body armor, Mission Accomplished, the war will pay for itself...NEED I GO ON????
Thursday, May 31, 2012
ARE WE REALLY NINE MEALS AWAY FROM ANARCHY?
That's exactly what happened in the U.S. in the aftermath of Hurricane
Katrina. People looted in order to feed themselves and their families.
Saturday, May 26, 2012
Friday, May 25, 2012
BAIN CAPITAL THROUGH THE LIPS OF THE GOP
“The Bain model is to go in at a very low price, borrow an immense
amount of money, pay Bain an immense amount of money and leave. I’ll let
you decide if that’s really good capitalism. I think that’s
exploitation.”
Newt Gingrich
“There is something inherently wrong when getting rich off failure and sticking it to someone else is how you do your business. I happen to think that that is indefensible.”
Rick Perry
"Bain Capital engages in vulture capitalism"
Rick Perry
Mitt Romney...a candidate you can be proud of...wake up America. He knows much more about laying off workers and eliminating jobs than he does building an economy and creating jobs. He has already shown he is a liar....Mitt Romney, the more you know, the less you will want to vote for him.
Newt Gingrich
“There is something inherently wrong when getting rich off failure and sticking it to someone else is how you do your business. I happen to think that that is indefensible.”
Rick Perry
"Bain Capital engages in vulture capitalism"
Rick Perry
Mitt Romney...a candidate you can be proud of...wake up America. He knows much more about laying off workers and eliminating jobs than he does building an economy and creating jobs. He has already shown he is a liar....Mitt Romney, the more you know, the less you will want to vote for him.
Wednesday, May 23, 2012
Saturday, May 19, 2012
STRANGE NO-CRED FELLOWS
[Romney] has Swiss bank accounts, Cayman Island accounts, owns shares
of Goldman Sachs while it forecloses on Florida and is himself a
stockholder in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac while he tries to think the
rest of us are too stupid to put the dots together and understand what
this is all about." -- Newt Gingrich
So how does Newt now go about (being the loyal party leader that he is) endorsing someone like Mitt Romney, who he knows is an absolute piece of shit? Obviously if he does campaign for Mitt, he will be forced to lie and tap dance to an extent he could win America's Most Talented, or whatever that crappy show is. It's a shame, because in my opinion, deep down inside...really deep, deep, deep down inside...I think Gingrich is a fairly decent man with a modicum of integrity (for a guy who cheats on every woman he hooks up with---in good health or not). Play the game, Newt. Play the game...and try not to show the public every time you say something decent about your candidate, the fact that you throw up a little in your mouth while doing it. Welcome to political prostitution and you be his ho, dude. You be his ho.
And that is the world...the "World According to Kimba." Thanks for reading!
So how does Newt now go about (being the loyal party leader that he is) endorsing someone like Mitt Romney, who he knows is an absolute piece of shit? Obviously if he does campaign for Mitt, he will be forced to lie and tap dance to an extent he could win America's Most Talented, or whatever that crappy show is. It's a shame, because in my opinion, deep down inside...really deep, deep, deep down inside...I think Gingrich is a fairly decent man with a modicum of integrity (for a guy who cheats on every woman he hooks up with---in good health or not). Play the game, Newt. Play the game...and try not to show the public every time you say something decent about your candidate, the fact that you throw up a little in your mouth while doing it. Welcome to political prostitution and you be his ho, dude. You be his ho.
And that is the world...the "World According to Kimba." Thanks for reading!
Friday, May 18, 2012
Sunday, May 13, 2012
Saturday, May 12, 2012
ROMNEY DOES HIS WAFFLING ACT OVER GAY ISSUES
In 2007, he appeared to support the right of same-sex couples to adopt, saying “obviously, that’s their right.”
But in 2011, a Romney spokesman said that same-sex adoption “should be assessed on a state-by-state basis.”
May 8, 2012: after President Obama’s endorsement of marriage equality was an admission that he was “fine” with same-sex couples adopting children, saying, “that’s something that people have a right to do.”
Two days later: "Actually, I think all states but one allow gay adoption. So that’s a position which has been decided by most of the state legislatures, including the one in my state some time ago. So I simply acknowledge the fact that gay adoption is legal in all states but one."
People want to know where Governor Romney stands on the issues...but he refuses to sit still and take one stand on anything....todays proclimation is tomorrows clarification...and tomorrows denial. What a schmuck....he is as phony as any politician could possibly be. A vote for him is a ......well who the hell knows what a vote for him would be....I guess it would mean one thing one day, and completely another the next.
Not only can you not count on him to back up anything he proclaims, he doesn't even check what he says....gay adoption is not "legal in all states but one." Do a fact check once in a while.....pretend what you say matters....because it does....it is going to re-elect the President. Where does the GOP get these idiot candidates....they had a world class candidate in Jon Huntsman....but he couldn't get any traction, even among three buffoons like Santorum, Gingrich and Mitt Flopney.
But in 2011, a Romney spokesman said that same-sex adoption “should be assessed on a state-by-state basis.”
May 8, 2012: after President Obama’s endorsement of marriage equality was an admission that he was “fine” with same-sex couples adopting children, saying, “that’s something that people have a right to do.”
Two days later: "Actually, I think all states but one allow gay adoption. So that’s a position which has been decided by most of the state legislatures, including the one in my state some time ago. So I simply acknowledge the fact that gay adoption is legal in all states but one."
People want to know where Governor Romney stands on the issues...but he refuses to sit still and take one stand on anything....todays proclimation is tomorrows clarification...and tomorrows denial. What a schmuck....he is as phony as any politician could possibly be. A vote for him is a ......well who the hell knows what a vote for him would be....I guess it would mean one thing one day, and completely another the next.
Not only can you not count on him to back up anything he proclaims, he doesn't even check what he says....gay adoption is not "legal in all states but one." Do a fact check once in a while.....pretend what you say matters....because it does....it is going to re-elect the President. Where does the GOP get these idiot candidates....they had a world class candidate in Jon Huntsman....but he couldn't get any traction, even among three buffoons like Santorum, Gingrich and Mitt Flopney.
Sunday, May 6, 2012
IT'S HARD TO BEAT THE LOGIC
"Governor Romney doesn't seem to get it.....maximizing (corporate) profits by whatever means necessary, be it through layoffs, downsizing, outsourcing, tax avoidance or union busting might not always be good for the average American worker, or the American economy."
"Why else would he want to spend trillions more to increase the tax cuts on our wealthiest Americans while raising taxes on 18 million working families? All the while stopping regulating the reckless behavior on Wall Street that helped crash the economy in the first place...they seem to think the same bad ideas will lead to a different result.....or maybe they are hoping we won't remember the last time we tried it their way. Well, I'm here to tell you, we were there, we remember and we are not going back...we are going forward."
Barack Obama
http://youtu.be/rodifJlis2c
"Why else would he want to spend trillions more to increase the tax cuts on our wealthiest Americans while raising taxes on 18 million working families? All the while stopping regulating the reckless behavior on Wall Street that helped crash the economy in the first place...they seem to think the same bad ideas will lead to a different result.....or maybe they are hoping we won't remember the last time we tried it their way. Well, I'm here to tell you, we were there, we remember and we are not going back...we are going forward."
Barack Obama
http://youtu.be/rodifJlis2c
Saturday, May 5, 2012
THEY'RE AT IT AGAIN
No new ground here....regular readers are well aware of my stances on previous measures to adopt "sin" taxes on legal behaviors. They are inherently discriminatory and thus, unconstitutional. Well, California is at it again with their proposition 29, which will impose an additional $1 tax on each pack of cigarettes, and an equivalent tax increase on all other tobacco products.
Surprisingly, I do not see a measure to increase taxes on alcohol (for alcoholism cessation studies), saturated fat (for obesity research), use of petroleum (to fund green initiatives) or any other measure taxing behavior unhealthful to us, but legal none-the-less.
Discrimination is discrimination, and this measure must be stopped. Please vote no on proposition 29, regardless of how you personally feel towards smoking. This is not about smoking per se, it is about individual rights and unfair harassment by groups with hidden agendas. read the proposition, if enacted, they will not even have to spend the windfall revenue in this country. Schmucks.....vote no on proposition schmuck...number 29.
Surprisingly, I do not see a measure to increase taxes on alcohol (for alcoholism cessation studies), saturated fat (for obesity research), use of petroleum (to fund green initiatives) or any other measure taxing behavior unhealthful to us, but legal none-the-less.
Discrimination is discrimination, and this measure must be stopped. Please vote no on proposition 29, regardless of how you personally feel towards smoking. This is not about smoking per se, it is about individual rights and unfair harassment by groups with hidden agendas. read the proposition, if enacted, they will not even have to spend the windfall revenue in this country. Schmucks.....vote no on proposition schmuck...number 29.
Sunday, April 22, 2012
Friday, April 20, 2012
IS THERE ANY END TO ROMNEY'S INANE GIBBERISH?
"The pipeline will go through if I have to build it myself"
"Vote for Obama and Iraq will get the bomb...vote for me and they will not"
Holy shit, is there any stopping the inane, banal comments that ooze out of this man's pie hole? Anyone would be hard pressed to consume so many syllables and still manage to say absolutely nothing. Nothing....just an endless barrage of worthless rhetoric in a failed attempt to prey on the human condition known as stupidity.
Just how stupid do you think we are, Governor? How about you cease with the meaningless platitudes and level with us....or are you even capable? Has it been so long ago that you were actually yourself.....so long ago...years before you became this reprogrammed presidential running machine that you are incapable of delivering an original thought? Has it been so long that you don't even know what your personal viewpoints are without someone telling you what to think?
Thursday, April 19, 2012
THE GOP IS RIGHT--- THE MEDIA IS BIASED
Once again a republican claim is completely and totally shot down in flames...of course us liberals tend to argue with facts as opposed to the FOX dwellers. That's right............ an exhaustive new study by media watchdog Fairness & Accuracy in Reporting shows that the Sunday morning talk shows have been dominated over the last eight months by white, Republican men. AND that includes the (allegedly) completely biased MSNBC!
Wednesday, April 11, 2012
RYAN BETTER SNAP TO ATTENTION
According to a study by the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities:
“In 2009 the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program was responsible for lifting the income of 3.6 million Americans over the poverty line, providing an average of less than $300 in monthly food stamps to families in need. In 2010 this program lifted 3.9 million Americans above poverty, including 1.7 million children.“
“In 2009 the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program was responsible for lifting the income of 3.6 million Americans over the poverty line, providing an average of less than $300 in monthly food stamps to families in need. In 2010 this program lifted 3.9 million Americans above poverty, including 1.7 million children.“
And the Ryan budget plan will reduce the Food Stamp program by 133 BILLION over ten years. 13.35 billion in reductions each year over ten years....and he won't budge on the tax breaks for the uber rich. What an asshole. What an unfeeling, uncaring, unsympathetic asshole. What kind of a man would risk children going hungry while he maintains the tax breaks for multi-millionaires who do not need the money? This "SNAP" program has never been more important, given the economic hardships our fellow Americans are going through....
"In fact, America’s dependence on the SNAP program has been all the more important because of the tight job market and slow economy. From the economic collapse of 2007 until the start of the recovery in 2011, food stamp rolls grew from 26.3 million to almost 45 million.
The millionaires in our nation’s capital may never have to make eye contact with the reality of our ongoing recession. The rest of us are not so lucky. Half of the rest of us are poor or low income. Fifty-seven percent of American children live in a poor or low-income family. Out of all SNAP food stamp funding, approximately 75% goes precisely to these poor or low-income families with kids."
The millionaires in our nation’s capital may never have to make eye contact with the reality of our ongoing recession. The rest of us are not so lucky. Half of the rest of us are poor or low income. Fifty-seven percent of American children live in a poor or low-income family. Out of all SNAP food stamp funding, approximately 75% goes precisely to these poor or low-income families with kids."
Friday, April 6, 2012
25 MONTHS OF JOB GROWTH
Over two years of job growth....yes, it has been a slow, uphill battle. But then again, what did you expect? Did you expect the administration to come in and immediately stop the negative economic vortex of GOP slowdown / near-depressionary eight years of performance? Did you expect an immediate halt to two undeclared wars, a failed energy policy, near historic job loss and a surplus turned into a huge deficit? You did? Then you are either a fool...or you weren't paying attention. Please don't vote in November. Four more years of tax cuts for the rich...four more years of attempted world military domination....four more years of pushing the middle class down...four more years of Bush / Reagan policies might just end us.Sunday, April 1, 2012
SUPREMELY A MISTAKE
While the nation watches, or more accurately.......reads about (the court sessions are not televised by order of the court) the Supreme Court case over "Obama Care," I think it's time to discuss where the President went terribly wrong, while trying to do something terribly right.
Obama certainly had his heart in the right place as he sought to insure 40 million Americans who cannot get health care today. Most of the uninsured cannot afford the exploding costs for insurance to be sure, and in a perfect world the nation could afford to pick up the tab, but we simply cannot afford another expensive social program on the books. Obama claims efficiencies would make this program budget neutral, but I seriously doubt this claim. Virtually nothing is budget neutral coming out of Washington.
So where did he go wrong? In my opinion, when he caved in negotiations on creating a sense of competition in the free market, he killed it. The idea was simple. Anyone who cannot secure health care would be eligible to purchase a low cost form of Medicaid. Anyone would be eligible, and this would force insurance companies to sharpen their pencils if they wanted a piece of this newly formed pie.
Secondly, his notion that everyone would be mandated to get health care was a huge mistake. HUGE. Because taking away freedoms from Americans is never popular, and at its core is unconstitutional. And in doing so, he hurt small business, at its core just plain stupid in any economy, let alone our present condition.
Instead of forcing citizens to get health care, he should have shifted the focus to mandating the insurance companies to offer low cost plans for low income families....or they could go to government supported insurance...not for a full blown PPO, but a modest health care plan with moderate co-pays offering basic coverage.
Could it be he was so desperate to achieve a bi-partisan effort on health care he threw the baby out with the bathwater? I would say yes. And considering the almost universal criticism of all or portions of the Affordable Care Act, he certainly failed to get a return on the investment. He gave up way to much and got nothing in return for his efforts.
And he is about to pay the price for it as the Supreme Court is about to at minimum, bitch slap the President in public, and at worse, give him a public taking to the political woodshed.
The decision will be 5-4 and John Roberts will jump hurdles in order to write the opinion. This is one of the decisions that will be studied for generations to come. Judicial versus Executive powers. Conservative decision versus progressive president. A good idea poorly executed in my opinion.
And that is the world........."The World According to Kimba." Thanks for reading.
Saturday, March 31, 2012
Sunday, March 25, 2012
DON'T LIKE MY POLICIES....JUST SHAKE ME UP
"Well, I think you hit a reset button for the fall campaign. Everything changes. It's almost like an Etch-a-Sketch. You can kind of shake it up and we start all over again." --Mitt RomneyGive him credit folks, at least he is honest. This man will do or say whatever it takes to become elected. Once he gets the GOP nod, he is going to shake it up and become someone else...anyone else that can beat President Obama. So if you want to know which version of Mitt you are going to see tommorrow, check the polling data today.
Saturday, March 24, 2012
CHENEY GETS HEART TRANSPLANT
No truth to the rumor that the donor died from a shotgun blast to the face....
Sunday, March 18, 2012
Sunday, March 4, 2012
Saturday, February 25, 2012
Saturday, February 4, 2012
DON'T LET ANYONE CONVINCE YOU THINGS AREN'T GETTING BETTER
Numbers are funny things, you can slice them and dice them and pretty well let you spin them to justify any agenda....but there is no doubt, we are in full recovery. Jobs have increased for quite a while now...the stock market is at 12, we are out of Iraq and soon to be out of Afghanistan and we will save a fortune there.....it took a while, and the recovery has been agonizingly slow, but it appears all of the efforts of the GOP to make the Bush created recession Presidents Obama's "Waterloo" have completely failed.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)


































