Inspired by and quoted heavily from a thought-provoking piece by E.J.Dionne in the Washington Post: Forty years ago, American liberalism suffered a blow from which it has still not recovered. On April 4, 1968, a relatively brief but extraordinary moment of progressive reform ended, and a long period of conservative ascendancy began.
The assassination of Martin Luther King Jr. and the ensuing riots that engulfed the nation's capital and big cities across the country signaled the collapse of liberal hopes in a smoky haze of self-doubt and despair. Conservatives, on the run for much of the decade, found a broad new audience for their warnings against the disorders and disruptions bred by reform.
The assassination of Martin Luther King Jr. and the ensuing riots that engulfed the nation's capital and big cities across the country signaled the collapse of liberal hopes in a smoky haze of self-doubt and despair. Conservatives, on the run for much of the decade, found a broad new audience for their warnings against the disorders and disruptions bred by reform.
April 4th, 1968 is the day the United States of America, burst into flames and the fires have not abated to this day. To this day, it cannot be said that liberalism has ever recovered. It had twitched a finger or two during the ineffective Carter years and the House was lost in the GOP revolution spearheaded by Newt and Rush in the 90's during the Clinton years.
Liberalism, in fact, is so dead, that the last seven plus years, despite eight preceding years of relative peace and economic prosperity, a surplus and a balanced budget after 12 years of Republican sledgehammering before that, liberals have let the GOP frame the word "liberal" as if it was as shameful as the words "pedophile" or "batterer."
For reasons that have yet to be divined and adequately explained, the American public still has not caught on to the inescapable and incontrovertible fact that America's greatest failures since 1968, failures that include two illegal wars, a major terrorist attack, the indefinite suspension of the Constitution, the loss of a major American city and the most massive deficits ever seen in American economic history are the results of conservatism.
And still the party is fragmented. Hillary Clinton spends more time attacking Barack Obama and questioning his own dedication to change more so than John McCain, who, according to some major polls, is in a dead heat with both she and Obama.
And still, when Republicans block and deny resolutions apologizing to surviving relatives of lynching victims, block legislation that seeks to apologize for slavery itself, we allow them to sound reasonable. When they blame the indigent African Americans of New Orleans for the federal government's massive indifference and failure in the wake of Hurricane Katrina, when these people are openly called names like "deadbeats" and "losers" by conservatives, neocons and libertarians, they sound nastier than Nixon at his nastiest yet are allowed to keep their airtime and infest the airwaves time and again.
Civil rights? It's a quaint notion but one that hardly forms the basis for a comprehensive domestic policy, as Dick Cheney would put it. Largely lost are the last great messages, those powerfully musical and intoxicating clarion calls of change once uttered by the man who had been slaughtered 40 years ago today. Civil rights, liberalism, even hope itself had been torched along with dozens of American cities starting the day Dr. King was assassinated. While Republicans rally to inspire those with nonexistent marches with Dr. King, they also don't take the time to remind those whose support they're soliciting that they and members of their party have only helped widen a divide that the same Dr. Martin Luther King had only begun to bridge toward the end of his life.
It is easy to forget that the core themes of contemporary conservatism were born in response to the events of 1968. The attacks on "big government," the defense of states' rights, and the scorn for "liberal judicial activism," "liberal do-gooders," "liberal elitists," "liberal guilt" and "liberal permissiveness" were rooted in the reaction that gathered force as liberal optimism receded.
From the death of John F. Kennedy in November 1963 until the congressional elections of November 1966, liberals were triumphant, and what they did changed the world. Civil rights and voting rights, Medicare and Medicaid, clean air and clean water legislation, Head Start, the Job Corps and federal aid to schools had their roots in the liberal wave that began to ebb when Lyndon Johnson Democrats suffered broad losses in the 1966 voting. The decline that 1966 signaled was sealed after April 4, 1968.
From the death of John F. Kennedy in November 1963 until the congressional elections of November 1966, liberals were triumphant, and what they did changed the world. Civil rights and voting rights, Medicare and Medicaid, clean air and clean water legislation, Head Start, the Job Corps and federal aid to schools had their roots in the liberal wave that began to ebb when Lyndon Johnson Democrats suffered broad losses in the 1966 voting. The decline that 1966 signaled was sealed after April 4, 1968.
Martin Luther King left this earth at a moment of gloom, at least about the short term. "I feel this summer will not only be as bad but worse than last time," he said, four days before his death, in a sermon at Washington's National Cathedral. He was referring to the urban riots of the previous summer. And then came the days of chaos that followed his assassination.
Forty years later, is it possible to recapture the hope and energy of the days and years before that April 4? Has liberalism spent enough time in purgatory for the country to revisit how much was accomplished in its name and to acknowledge that the nation is better off for what the liberals did? Now is the moment to put an end to our contempt for liberalism. There was business left unfinished on that fateful day in 1968, and it is time to take it up again.
6 comments:
Off to San Fran for a few days with the family... but I wish to say I see some well refuted (i.e., tired ol') arguments tucked away in your commentary here. I will let them "lie."
Since Andrew Jackson until JFK voted against the Civil Rights Act the first time around and Nixon voted for it (and beyond this date), the Democrats have been at first pro-slavery, the Repubs have been anti-slavery. the Dems have been anti-segregation the Repubs pro-segregation. And now the Repubs do not divide their party by ethnicity, gender, or how much money they make, we also do not sport a KKK Grand Wizard/KKK recruiter in congress.
If anyone were to be sued for reparations, it should be the DNC.
The assassination of Martin Luther King was truly one of the darkest days on the American landscape. Too many only remember him for the compelling speeches that he delivered. This is unfortunate. For his best was displayed in within his sermons. His passion for the greater part of this struggle called life.
“But before I was a civil rights leader, I was a preacher of the gospel. This was my first calling and it still remains my greatest commitment. You know, actually all that I do in civil rights I do because I consider it a part of my ministry. I have no other ambitions in life but to achieve excellence in the Christian ministry. I don’t plan to run for any political office. I don’t plan to do anything but remain a preacher. And what I’m doing in this struggle, along with many others, grows out of my feeling that the preacher must be concerned about the whole man.” (Sermon entitled “Why Jesus Called A Man A Fool” - August 27, 1967)
What we lost was not some grand turning point in American liberalism; what we lost was a voice of reason. A voice that appealed to all true sensibility. A voice of compassion and a voice of love. A voice that transcended the right and the left. A voice that still needs to be heard but is lost within the white noise of America; the petty chatter of nothingness.
I rarely express concern about the no foam low-fat caramel macchiatos, but I do talk freely about the important issues of life; those I think MLK would have expressed if he were here today. The importance of the sanctity of life, the responsibility of helping the poor, and personal responsibility that each of us should bear, being but a few. I find myself in a strange paradox; seeing the America that I love so much embroiled in partisan issues, fueled by personal interest rather than serving the greater good, that make our situation so distasteful. This is our children’s inheritance from the right and the left.
Your comments further underscore my frustration with the current situation, both politically and otherwise. Like MLK I am a follower of Jesus. One who loves God and loves his fellow man. A follower of the message that transcends both the right and the left. A follower with a strong desire to distinguish himself from those who claim christianity simply for the sake of appeasing personal conscience or the purpose of political agendas.
Neither side seems to get it. MLK did. His unfinished business was not that of a particular political bent. He was called to serve his fellow man for a higher purpose; exercising his faith to make us a better people in a better place.
To be sure November will come and go; but the important issues will remain to plague us if we do not consider passing up the political rhetoric and get down to the business of serving in the same example that left us 40 years ago.
Socal,
Thank you so much for your comment. I agree whole heartedly with your viewpoints, and can only underscore one undeniable fact....you should blog. You MUST blog.
After reading your comment I can only say that you have the writing skills and viewpooints to create those "clarion calls for justice" and indeed, godliness that we have sorely lacked since the untimely death of MLK.
If you do, please drop another comment on my humble blog so I can link to it. I think you should, and in fact, you have already named it..."The Voice of Reason...an antidote to the petty chatter of nothingness."
What amazes me most about MLK was how much hatred he endured over his lifetime. He was a radical, and a major pain for the government, and he was treated accordingly.
He is a perfect example of what can happen when one voice of reason is heard. And suddenly one voice becomes two, and three, and so on.
You have found your voice, and you certainly know what is in your heart...let your voice be heard!!!
Thanks again, Kimba
.
“I am much afraid that schools will prove to be great gates of hell unless they diligently labor in explaining the Holy Scriptures, engraving them in the hearts of youth. I advise no one to place his child where the scriptures do not reign paramount. Every institution in which men are not increasingly occupied with the word of God must become corrupt.”
Martin Luther King Jr.
.
"History will have to record that the greatest tragedy of this period of social transition was not the strident clamor of the bad people, but the appalling silence of the good people."
"Rarely do we find men who willingly engage in hard, solid thinking. There is an almost universal quest for easy answers and half-baked solutions. Nothing pains some people more than having to think."
Martin Luther King Jr. (1929 - 1968)
.
I checked my quote to see if it was plagiarized... did you check yours? Lynn Cheney tried to cover up this obvious fact of Martin Luther King's life, but the truth leaked past even Cheney's wife. That evil Republican!
The sad fact is - as one professor put it, "Page after page contains nothing but direct, verbatim transcriptions of the work of others. In 1990, the King Project estimated that less than half of some chapters was actually written by King himself. Since then, even more of his 'borrowings' have been traced."
.
Post a Comment